Legal Opinion
Guttman v. Khalsa
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 19, 2006No. 03-2244PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Stuart Guttman appeals the dismissal on summary judgment of his claims that G.T.S. Khalsa, Livingston Parsons, and the State of New Mexico violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by revoking his medical license in a flawed state administrative proceeding. The district court dismissed his claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. In the alternative, the district court held that Khalsa and Parsons were protected from suit by absolute immunity and that the state was entitled to sovereign…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Surender Malhan v. Secretary United States DepartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Moss v. KoppCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Guttman v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.