Legal Opinion
Snead v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 28, 1927No. 5750PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
Under the provisions of section 28 of the banking act of 1919 (Acts 1919, pp. 135, 219), the plaintiff in error was presented for felony consisting in causing the fraudulent insolvency of the Citizens Bank of Carrollton while under his management and control as its president and director. He demurred to the indictment, and excepts to the judgment of the court in overruling his demurrer and thereby sustaining the indictment. The presentment charges that A. K. Snead, “on the 31st day of December in the year 1925, in the county aforesaid, then and there unlawfully and with force and arms, being…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hawes v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Youmans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Third National Bank v. McCullough Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Fordham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Manley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Manley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Franklin Savings & Loan Co. v. BrananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Long Tobacco Harvesting Co. v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Carter v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.