Legal Opinion

(PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 8, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01174Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ALEXANDER JAMES, No. 2:23-cv-1174 DAD DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 METZGER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 15 16 Defendant, 17 18 Plaintiff Anthony Alexander James is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was 19 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Pending before the undersigned is defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the 21 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 5.) For the reasons stated below,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API