State v. Luce
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
The defendant was convicted of criminal trespass, 17 — A M.R.S.A. § 402, following a jury trial and has appealed.
We sustain the appeal.
The defendant was originally indicted for burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401. Tried before a jury, he moved for acquittal at the close of the evidence. The presiding justice granted the motion with respect to the charge of burglary but proceeded to instruct the jury on the “lesser included offense” of criminal trespass. Although he did not object to the instruction given, the defendant now asserts that criminal trespass is not a lesser included…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DavenportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. LeemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- State v. SnowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Newell v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. ScottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. OcheltreeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. GoodallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. ColsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.