Legal Opinion
Cardiacsense LTD v. Garmin International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 2025No. 2:24-cv-11368Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CARDIACSENSE LTD, 2-24-CV-11368-TGB-KGA Plaintiff, HON. TERRENCE G. BERG vs. ORDER GRANTING GARMIN GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S INC., MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant. (ECF NO. 5) Plaintiff Cardiacsense LTD (“Cardiacsense”) sued Garmin International, Inc. (“Garmin”) for infringing upon U.S. Patent 7,980,998 (“the ‘998 patent”). ECF No. 1. Garmin moved to dismiss Cardiacsense’s lawsuit on the grounds that the claims of the ‘998 patent are not patent eligible pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. ECF…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.