Legal Opinion

Craven v. Martin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Claim. Before Judge Jones. Habersham superior court. May 10, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

In view of the elaborate discussion of. the question here involved which is to be found in the cases of Hollis v. Lamb, 114 Ga. 740 (40 S. E. 751), and Oliver v. James, 131 Ga. 182 (62 S. E. 73), no further discussion is necessary here. It is proper, however, to call attention to the fact that this ease falls within that class of eases where the entry on the execution and on the execution docket was relied on, instead of “bona fide attempts to enforce the same against the defendant within the stated period,” to prevent dormancy of the fi. fa. Had it appeared from the record, by evidence duly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hollis v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Oliver v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Moultrie Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Clark v. ShouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Lathem & Sons v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Minter v. FelderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Ryals v. WidencampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API