Legal Opinion
Ryals v. Widencamp
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 10, 1937No. 11615PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hutoiieson, Justice.
1. In a claim case the claimant may attack the execution on any ground which could then be urged by the defendant in fi. fa.; but if the execution is valid as against the defendant, the levy may proceed to subject any interest in the property covered by the lien against defendant. Ansley Co. v. O’Byrne, 120 Ga. 618 (48 S. E. 228).
2. Where a claimant acquired title from the defendant, in fi. fa. after levy on the property and after the defendant in fi. fa', had filed an affidavit of illegality of the levy, 'which illegality proceeding had terminated adversely to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ansley Co. v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Hollis v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Stanford v. ConnerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Fulcher v. MandellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Lewis v. Moultrie Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A. B. Farquhar Co. Limited v. MyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Pie v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938