Burton v. Natural Gas & Petroleum Corp.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.:
We sustain the objection to the prior statement of the witness. We are of the opinion that in this state the same foundation for the introduction of prior statements showing hostility, or ill feeling, on the part of a witness must be laid as are uniformly laid as a basis for the introduction of prior contradictory statements. State v. Deputy, 3 Penn. 19, 50 A. 176; Jones’ Blue Book on Ev. (1914), vol. 5, § 850; 2 Wigmore on Ev., §§ 953, 964, 1025; Eagan v. Lentz, 156 Cal. 681, 105 P. 951, 20 Ann. Cas. 221, and note, and cases there cited. See note to State v. Smith, 16 A. L. R. 984.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fagan v. LentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. GrantNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1926
- Bove v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1926
- State v. CasperNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1926
- State v. DeputyNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bove v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1926
- State v. CasperNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1926