Legal Opinion

Old Republic Insurance v. Concast, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 22, 1984No. 83 Civ. 986 (RLC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Old Republic Insurance Co. (“Old Republic”), has sued Concast, Inc. (“Concast”), Sumitomo Heavy Industries (“SHI”), and Federal Insurance Co. (“Federal”), for a declaratory judgment that its Umbrella Policy with Concast does not afford coverage to SHI. Old Republic provides excess liability insurance to Concast. Federal is Concast’s primary insurer. The issue of SHI’s coverage under Concast’s insurance policy with Old Republic arises out of a subcontract between Concast and SHI. The question here is whether, under the terms of Old Republic’s policy with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Old Republic Insurance v. Concast, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Mobile Drilling Barge or VesselDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975
  3. Hs Equities, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and Third-Party v. Marvin Michael, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Henning v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stevens Painton Corp. v. First State InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Industrial Chemical & Fiberglass Corp. v. The North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Industrial Chemical & Fiberglass Corp. v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. International Marine, L.L.C. v. Integrity FCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API