Thomas v. State

We affirm as to all issues raised in this Anders1 appeal. However, appellate counsel correctly points out that there is a scrivener’s error in the judgment. The judgment incorrectly states that Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere. In actuality, Appellant was convicted following a jury trial. Therefore, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error. See Harvey v. State, 146 So.3d 66 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); Garvin v. State, 83 So.3d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Lopez-Vasquez v. State, 966 So.2d 996 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). Appellant need not be present for this correction. See Sirota v. State,…