Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thorpe

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 5, 1981PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

This case involves the construction of the Massachusetts communications interception statute, G. L. c. 272, § 99, as appearing in St. 1968, c. 738, § 1. Prior to trial in the Superior Court on the charge of corrupting a municipal official under G. L. c. 268A, § 2 (a) (2), the defendant Francis Thorpe moved, pursuant to G. L. c. 272, § 99 P, to suppress certain tape recordings of conversations between himself and the Commonwealth’s chief witness. After a hearing, the judge denied the motion. Thorpe sought and was granted leave to file an interlocutory appeal. See Mass. R. Crim. P. 15 (b) (2),…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. D'AmourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. LykusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API