Legal Opinion

People v. Tuck

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 2012No. A131624PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

—In 1999, defendant George Christopher Tuck was 19 years old and, for engaging in sexual relations with his then 13-year-old girlfriend, by a plea of no contest was convicted of committing lewd acts on a child under the age of 14. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a).)1 Now, more than 12 years later, he seeks to be relieved of the lifetime requirement that he register as a sex offender, arguing that this requirement violates his right to equal protection of the law. After considering uncontradicted evidence that Tuck poses no threat of engaging in future sexual misconduct, the trial…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. VonWahldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. D.M. v. Department of JucticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Bernardo Salado-Alva v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. P. v. Bennett CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API