Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pope

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 24, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Assuming, without deciding, that it was improper for the District Court judge to allow the prosecutor’s motion to amend the complaint at the close of the evidence, the error was rendered immaterial by the appeal from the District Court judgment to the Superior Court. Commonwealth v. Calhane, 108 Mass. 431, 432 (1871). Commonwealth v. Sheehan, 108 Mass. 432, note (1871). Commonwealth v. Harvey, 111 Mass. 420, 421 (1873). Commonwealth v. Holmes, 119 Mass. 195, 199 (1875). Commonwealth v. Fredericks, 119 Mass. 199, 205 (1875). Commonwealth v. Burke, 121 Mass. 39, 40 (1876). Commonwealth v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mann v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Whitmarsh v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Commonwealth v. FredericksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Enbinder v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Foley v. Lowell Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API