Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1980No. 14080PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Associate Judge:

On October 20, 1978, petitioner, an annuitant of the Metropolitan Police Department, was found by the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board (the Board) to have been restored in the years 1974 and 1975 to “an earning capacity fairly comparable to the [then] current rate of compensation of the position [occupied by petitioner] at the time of [his] retirement.” D.C. Code 1973, § 4-530. 1 Pursuant to this statute, the Board ordered that annuity payments to the petitioner cease one year from the date of its determination.

On appeal, we are asked to consider whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Joseph R. Hyde v. Walter N. TobrinerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Kenneth B. Crawford v. Robert E. McLaughlin Board of Commissioners of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Ridge v. Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Simmons v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. McNeal v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Haynie v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API