Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order appealed from should be affirmed. The court specifically alerted defendant to the possibility that a conflict of interest might flow from joint representation of defendant *719and a codefendant by the same attorney, and informed defendant of his right to separate counsel.- Despite this admonition, defendant insisted on continued joint representation. Having determined to persist in that course of action, defendant may not subsequently contend that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because of a possible conflict of interest arising from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. LloydNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. CloseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. CloseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. People v. OritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API