Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. Town of Plainville

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 4, 1997No. 15393Published

1DissentBerdon, J.

In order to put this case in its proper perspective, I start with the undisputed facts that the named defendant, the town of Plainville (town), neither before the trial court, the Appellate Court nor this court, has ever made the claim, explicitly or implicitly, that the failure of the named plaintiff (plaintiff) to describe her injuries in the notice with specificity was the result of her intention to mislead the town or that the town was prejudiced in any manner.

Furthermore, the issue before us must be decided in light of our recent jurisprudence pertaining to the notice statute, General…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Andover LP I v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Marino v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API