Legal Opinion

Murphy v. George Murphy, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam Lyman, J.

Plaintiff sues on his own behalf as a stockholder and on behalf of all other stockholders of a corporation for specific performance of a certain contract. The complaint alleges the following facts:

Plaintiff and one Percy Y. Howe, now deceased, owned all the stock in George Murphy, Inc., the defendant corporation in this action. On July 20,1938 they entered into an agreement whereby each agreed, upon severance of his connection with the eorporation by death or otherwise, to sell at par ($100) all of *648the shares of stock he then owned in the corporate defendant back to the corporate defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Richards v. Ernst Wiener Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. In re the Estate of GalewitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  4. Greater New York Carpet House, Inc. v. HerschmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nakano v. Nakano McGlone Nightingale Advertising, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Insurance Agents, Inc. v. AbelCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API