Legal Opinion

Brockman v. Aulger

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1850PublishedCited by 20 opinions

This was a bill in Chancery, filed to obtain an account of partnership transactions. The proceedings under the bill, are fully stated in the opinion of the Court. The third exception, taken in the Circuit Court, to the report of the master, is that, • “ no report is made of the accounts between the parties on the partnership books.” The decree was pronounced by Minshall, Judge, at the March term, 1850, of the Brown Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCaton, J.

This was a bill filed for an account between partners. It states, that the complainant owned a carding machine, and that the defendant was a wool carder by occupation. That they entered into an agreement, by which the complainant was to furnish the machine and to pay all the expense of running the same, except manual labor and repairs. And to furnish lard to be sold to customers. The defendant was to run the machine at certain specified rates, and to have one-third of the compensation received for carding, and the complainant two-thirds. The defendant was to sell the lard furnished by the…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hurd v. GoodrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Barnes v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Ennesser v. HudekIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Pennell v. Lamar InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Prince v. CutlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API