Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided March 30, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Perry L. Adkisson Chancellor Texas A M University System 219 Systems Administration Bldg. College Station, Texas 77843

Re: Assessment of Capital Recovery Fees by the city of Houston against Texas A M University for waste water services (RQ-1533)

Dear Mr. Adkisson:

You inform us that the city of Houston is seeking to collect a capital recovery fee for the use of the city's waste water system, and ask the following question:

Can the City of Houston legally assess the capital recovery fees set out herein against a state agency for utilizing its waste water system?

Texas A M University is building…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lower Colorado River Authority v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Wichita Falls Ex Rel. L. E. Whitham & Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Conlen Grain & Mercantile, Inc. v. Texas Grain Sorghum Producers BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API