Legal Opinion
State v. Taccetta
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 2002PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
797 A.2d 884 (2002)
351 N.J. Super. 196
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Martin R. TACCETTA, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 7, 2002.
Decided May 29, 2002.
Steven B. Duke of the Connecticut bar, admitted pro hac vice, New Haven, CT, argued the cause for appellant (Law, Froelich & Landesman, attorneys, Kearny; Mr. Duke and Charles Landesman, Kearny, on the brief).
Robert E. Bonpietro, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (David Samson, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Bonpietro, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. PrecioseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gerald GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MaharMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- State v. TaccettaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- State v. GreuberUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RountreeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.