Railroad Commission of Texas v. Continental Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Chief Justice.
Appellee asserts that its right “to produce the quantities of oil daily which it can produce without waste * * * is the subject matter of the suit.” The judgment of the court gave to appellee the very right covered by this proposition — the right to produce the quantity of oil daily which it can produce without waste; there was no limitation of quantity under the court’s judgment; the judgment'gave to appellee the unlimited right to develop its field to the fullest extent possible without waste. Against the court’s judgment — and against appellee’s proposition —…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Railroad Commission v. MarrsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Railroad Commission v. Woods Exploration & Producing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1966
- Railroad Commission v. Woods Exploration & Producing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1966