Bailey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is another war risk insurance ease. The court directed a verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, and the only question presented is whether there was substantial evidence tending to show that plaintiff became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the policy.
No premiums were paid after February l, 1919, so that the policy expired March 31, 1919. Suit was not brought until July 2, 1.931, more than ten years after the policy had lapsed. In September, 19J8, plaintiff was in the service in France, and while on duly at the front was obliged to drink water…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Le DucCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. HairstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. FlyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parrigan v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1933
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1933
- United States v. ClementCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933