Legal Opinion

Trout v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 7, 1983No. 469-82TPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*220MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DE-PENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

GIBSON, Judge:

This is a gift tax refund case, arising out of the alleged premature payment of such taxes, which at this point comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. While not pleaded with specificity, petitioner premises jurisdiction in this court on the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1491, and the basis of the substantive claim is bottomed on Title 26 U.S.C.

Plaintiff underscores the merits of his claim in his petition,1 while apparently recognizing the untimeliness thereof, by alleging, inter alia, that:

“... in consideration of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Furst v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  3. Rock v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  4. United States v. Chas. B. Peters, United States of America v. Jessie M. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Laurel Hill Cemetery Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Raymark Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. DiStasio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Weiner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. Schiff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Rohmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API