Legal Opinion

Hamblen v. Kazlauski

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 8, 1958No. 12307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity action plaintiff (ap-pellee) sought recovery of damages for personal injuries and property loss sustained as the result of a collision between a tractor-trailer unit owned and operated by him, and a cattle truck owned by defendants (appellants) and driven by one of them, in the early afternoon of July 12, 1955, near the intersection of U. S. Highways No. 30 and No. 35 in Starke County, Indiana. The jury found defendants guilty and assessed plaintiff’s damages at $40,000, upon which verdict the court entered judgment. Defendants’ motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irvin Jacobs & Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Commercial Credit Corp. v. PepperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. Charles v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maurie H. Berman v. The Palatine Insurance Company, Limited, the Home Insurance Company, Androchester American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  2. United States of America, Libellant-Appellant v. 4 Cases Slim-Mint Chewing Gum, Thompson Medical Company, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  3. George Silbernagel v. Lloyd VossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Keeney v. AverySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. Hamblen v. KazlauskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API