Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodríguez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 4, 2008No. 06-2656PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge.
In United States v. Andújar-Arias, 507 F.3d 734 (1st Cir.2007), a panel of this court held that sentencing disparity attributable to the selective inauguration of so-called “fast-track” programs for the processing of immigration crimes could not form the basis for a variant sentence. Id. at 739. This appeal requires us to gauge the continued validity of Andújar-Arias in light of the Supreme Court’s subsequent decisions in Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007), and Kimbrough v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. ClogstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Comfort v. Lynn School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Rivera-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Millan-IsaacCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.