Legal Opinion

Center for Food Safety v. Vilsack

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 25, 2011No. 10-17719, 10-17722PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

The Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (“APHIS”) and Intervenors Monsanto et al. appeal the district court’s decision granting a preliminary injunction that mandates the destruction of juvenile Roundup Ready sugar beets planted pursuant to permits issued by the agency. Because the plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, we reverse and vacate the preliminary injunction and direct that the permits be given full force and effect.

I

Olivier de Serres, the father of French agriculture, exclaimed in 1600 of the sugar…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Friends of the Santa Clara v. US Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Center for Environmental Law & Policy v. United States Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Salix v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2013
  5. E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API