Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wyrick v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2014No. 2012-1670PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Charles G. Wyrick appeals the judgment of the court of appeals denying his request for a writ of mandamus that would require appellee Industrial Commission to award scheduled loss benefits for the loss of use of his left arm. Wyrick argues that the commission abused its discretion when it relied on the report of Dr. D. Ann Middaugh as evidence that Wyrick had retained some use of his left arm to deny his request for benefits under R.C. 4123.57(B).

{¶ 2} We agree that the commission abused its discretion when it relied on the report of Dr. Middaugh. Consequently, we reverse the judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Lopez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Alcoa Building Products v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Franks v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Woodman v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Retirement Sys. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State ex rel. Casey v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State ex rel. Heilman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State ex rel. Block v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Ottinger v. B&B Wrecking & Excavation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API