Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 2001No. A091784PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1113Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether Civil Code section 8461 immunity precludes suit by a child who suffered injuries when he attempted to retrieve his kite from an overhead power line. We determine the utility is immune from suit under these circumstances and none of the statutory exception applies. Further, we conclude Public Utilities Code section 2106 does not abrogate the immunity afforded a utility by section 846. We therefore affirm the entry of summary judgment.

Background

On April 4, 1998, 10-year-old Joshua Jackson was playing video games at the home of his friend,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Prince v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Stanton v. Lackawanna Energy, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Picardi v. ZimmiondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Manuel v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Miller v. WeitzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API