Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Nyquist
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1979No. Civ-1972-325PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, Chief Judge.
I. DAYTON MOTION
On June 29,1978,1 directed the parties to submit proposed findings to the court pursuant to Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406, 97 S.Ct. 2766, 53 L.Ed.2d 851 (1977), setting forth “the extent of the incremental effects resulting from the acts found in this court’s April 30, 1976 decision to have been constitutional violations.” Since the Board’s submission in response to this order was inadequate, on September 5, 1978, I directed the Board to prepare a supplementary response. All papers have been submitted, and oral argument on the question…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tasby v. WrightDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- George Arthur v. Ewald P. Nyquist, and Community Advisory Board for Bilingual Education of Buffalo, Etc., Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1980
- United States v. State of Tex.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1980
- Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.