Legal Opinion
Good Humor Corp. v. Village of Mundelein
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1965No. 39026PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
Good Humor, Inc. instituted this action against the Village of Mundelein and certain of its officials to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance of the village. Andrew N. Korn and Katherine Korn, doing business as Kay’s Mobile Freezerettes, were allowed to intervene as parties plaintiff. Judgment on the pleadings was entered in favor of the defendants, and Good Humor, Inc., hereafter plaintiff, has appealed. The case involves questions arising under the constitutions of the United States and of this State.
As originally adopted, the ordinance prohibited the peddling of food, ice cream and other…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Good Humor Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- N. J. Good Humor, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Bradley BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- City of Chicago v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Carrollton v. BazzetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Chicazgo v. RhineIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chloree Vaden, D/B/A Ree's Confectioneries v. Village of Maywood, Illinois, a Municipal Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Triple a Services, Inc. v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Blue Sky Bar, Inc. v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Delight Wholesale Co. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.