Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Escoett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

Two causes of action are set forth in the complaint. The first is addressed to the equity side of the court. In it plaintiff seeks to have the defendant account. The second cause of action is one at law. The defendant made an application at Special Term, New York county, to dismiss the first and second causes of action upon the ground that facts sufficient to constitute the causes of action were not pleaded. Furthermore, the defendant demanded summary judgment. The court denied defendant’s motion.

We are inclined to the view that Special Term correctly decided that the second cause of action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harry R. Gordon Co. v. Garcia Sugars Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Jasper v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Byrne v. Blaker Advertising Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Guy C. Mariner, Inc. v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. DerecktorNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Rubenstein v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API