Legal Opinion
Eddlemon v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 1919No. Civ. No. 2783PublishedCited by 7 opinions
■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him, arising out of a collision between an automobile which the plaintiff was driving and a train operated by the defendants, at a grade crossing at Stege station in the city of Richmond. A verdict was rendered in the sum of seven, thousand dollars, which was reduced by the judge of the trial court, upon a motion for a new trial, to four thousand dollars. Judgment was entered against the defendants for the reduced amount, from which they prosecute this appeal.
The plaintiff was a police officer of the city of Richmond. On the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Larrabee v. Western Pacific Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Anello v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. MacMullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Cox v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1936
- Reger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.