Legal Opinion

Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Willoughby

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1933No. 3956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Appellee was injured at a loading dock belonging to appellant in the town of Borger. She and three companions were out riding on ,the Sunday night of the accident. Appellee .and her uncle occupied the front seat of the .automobile. Returning from Panhandle to their home at Whittenberg, northeast of Borger, they turned from Main street and .followed Grand avenue due east, intending .to later take a street leading north toward their home. The streets of Borger. run at right angles to each other, north and south and east and west. The line of the Panhan-dle & Santa ES Railway…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lee v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Stooksbury v. SwanTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Blakesley v. KircherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. City of Beaumont v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Munves v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Platt v. BenderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Straka v. Farmers' Mut. Protective Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Johnson v. MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API