Legal Opinion

Deschner v. City of Ipswich

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1932No. File No. 7093PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

The respondents are the owners of a brick building located in the city of Ipswich, S. D. In August, 1927, following a heavy rain, water ran down the street on the west side of respondent’s building, washed under the sidewalks, and broke through the wall of an areaway and into the basement, causing considerable damage to the building. The respondents brought this action against the city of Ipswich to recover the amount of the damage. From a verdict and judgment in favor of the respondents, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the city has appealed.

The evidence disclosed that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Atchison v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Henderson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Waters v. Village of Bay ViewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Adams v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Haley & Lang Co. v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bucholz v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hamilton v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Nelson v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Eisenstein v. Mayor of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Wilson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API