Legal Opinion
Schlesinger v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 6, 2012No. 09-CV-4278 (ADS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Nat Schlesinger (“Schlesinger” or “the petitioner”) petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking to vacate or set aside his conviction and sentence on the ground that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons discussed below, Schlesinger’s petition is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
On May 15, 2006, a jury convicted Nat Schlesinger on twenty-eight counts of mail fraud conspiracy, substantive mail and wire fraud, money laundering conspiracy, and substantive money laundering, arising out…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Samuel Anstey v. David Ballard, WardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Maria Elosu v. Middlefork Ranch IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Riley v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Sipes v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Com. v. Smith, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.