Mullican v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice BueNett
The plaintiff in error was convicted on two separate indictments charging false pretense. He was sentenced to serve three (3) years in the State penitentiary in each case. These sentences were orderd to run concurrently.
There are numerous assignments of error, all of which are to the effect that the evidence preponderates against the verdict and in favor of the innocence of the accused, on the theory that no false representations of the existing facts were shown and no representation that the proposed development by the plaintiff in error about which the charge is made was to be completed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AlthauseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- State v. HigginsTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Ownbey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Canter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1881
- Rothschild v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- State v. BrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Horn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.