Faunteroy v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Appellants challenge their convictions in Superior Court for involuntary manslaughter (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2405) of their in fant son. Together, they argue that: (1) the trial court improperly instructed on the standard of criminal conduct, particularly the degree of negligence, necessary to sustain a finding of involuntary manslaughter; (2) the trial court erroneously admitted into evidence photographs of the deceased; (3) the trial court incorrectly found a legal duty on the part of appellants as parents to provide medical care for the deceased; and (4) there was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ernest W. Harried v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- United States v. BradfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- March v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- John Henry Maxwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. Dale R. NeumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Gethers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Burgess v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.