Legal Opinion

Braswell v. Federal Land Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1929No. 6930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

1. The ease was previously before this court, where the ' principles of law' now involved were settled. Braswell v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 165 Ga. 123 (139 S. E. 861).

2. The grounds of the motion do not raise the point that the direction of the verdict was erroneous because there were questions of fact that should have been submitted to the jury, and therefore that question is not presented for decision. Gilliard v. Johnston, 161 Ga. 17 (129 S. E. 434); Tyson v. Anderson, 164 Ga. 677 (139 S. E. 349); Kerce v. Davis, 165 Ga. 168 (140 S. E. 287).

3. The verdict was supported by evidence,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilliard v. Johnston & MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Braswell v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Kerce v. Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Plymel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farlow v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Hall v. Eufaula Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Kinney v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Farlow v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Jackson v. MullinoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API