Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Youngblood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1960No. 21041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

While a contract involving any interest in land must be in writing to bind the parties (Code § 20-401 (4)), this provision does not extend to cases where “there has been such part performance of the contract as would render it a fraud of the party refusing to comply, if the court did not compel a performance.” Code § 20-402 (3).

The terms of the oral contract between the parties were alleged with sufficient clarity and definiteness. The contract alleged is fair, just, and equitable, since the petitioner agreed to assume the entire indebtedness, principal and interest,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilliard v. Johnston & MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Braswell v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ehlers v. Schwall & HeuettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Holland v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Masters v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API