Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Warren

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

The defendants, five in number, have been convicted, under the Pub. Sts. c. 99, § 10, as amended by the St. of 1887, c. 448, § 2, of being present in a common gaming-house when gaming implements were found there. At their trial they asked for three instructions. 1. That there was no evidence that the building described in the complaint was unlawfully used *282as and for a common gaming-house, for the purpose of gaming for money or other property. 2. That there was no evidence1 that idle or dissolute or other persons resorted to the premises for that purpose. 3. That there was no evidence that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Commonwealth v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Chase v. Proprietors of the Revere HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Commonwealth v. JenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. NewmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Commonwealth v. RiversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API