Legal Opinion

Leighton v. Lambert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 35,409Published

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs were vendors in a land contract running to defendant Paul Lambert, who defaulted in payments, and plaintiffs'recovered judgment for repossession before a circuit court commissioner. Defendant Lambert appealed to the circuit court and incident thereto gave the statutory bond executed by himself as principal and by the defendant Globe Indemnity Company as surety. Upon hearing in the circuit court the judgment rendered by the circuit court commissioner was affirmed and substantially a month later (March 6, 1930) plaintiffs became repossessed of the property. This is an action in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Lockwood v. Thunder Bay River Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. August v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Smith v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API