Legal Opinion

Aaron v. Mahl

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 2009No. 26607PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waller

This is a direct appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of appellant Jim Aaron’s action to enforce California and Indiana judgments against respondent Susan Mahl (a/k/a Susan Scott). We certified the appeal pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, and now reverse.

*588FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Respondent was a California attorney.1 Between 1996 and 1999, respondent was a civil litigator and managing partner with the law firm now known as Rehon & Roberts (“R & R”).2 Respondent left the firm in November 1999 to start her own firm. In January 2000, R & R brought a California lawsuit against respondent for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Jinks Ex Rel. Estate of Jinks v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Insurance v. Beazer Homes Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. 16 Jade Street, LLC v. R. Design Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. 16 Jade Street, LLC v. R. Design Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Crosby v. Prysmian Communications Cables & Systems USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Aaron v. MahlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API