Legal Opinion

Fortenberry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 9, 1994No. CR-92-1634PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

This court's opinion of July 29, 1994, is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion substituted therefor.

The appellant, Thomas J. Fortenberry, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 20, Ala.R.Crim.P.Temp. (now Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P.). The appellant was convicted of murder made capital because two or more persons were killed during one course of conduct and because the murders were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Mann v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hallford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Hamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Thomas J. Fortenberry v. Michael W. HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Dobyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. Lawhorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API