Legal Opinion

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 21, 2020No. 4:19-cv-07562Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF TRADE 10 WILSON CHUNG, et al., SECRET DISCLOSURE, DENYING MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE 11 Defendants. ORDER, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO 12 SEAL 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 136, 137, 141, 149, 154, 14 156, 158, 160 15 Before the court are defendants Plantronics Inc.’s (“Plantronics”) and Thomas 16 Puorro’s (“Puorro”) motion to strike and challenge the sufficiency of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API