Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Farrar's Plumbing & Heating Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 27, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 88-0052PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.
An apartment complex owned by Orange Grove Associates, Ltd. was being constructed by Shoecraft Contracting, Inc. Defendant Farrar’s Plumbing and Heating Co. (Farrar) was the plumbing sub-contractor. Plaintiff United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. was the owner’s fire insurer. The complex burned. Plaintiff paid the losses and, contending that the fire was due to the negligence of Farrar, brought a subrogation action against it. Farrar successfully sought summary judgment because of the following provisions in the contract between Orange Grove and Shoe-craft:
1…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tokio Marine And Fire Insurance Company Limited v. Employers Insurance Of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- South Tippecanoe School Building Corp. v. Shambaugh & Son, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. H.R.H. Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Board of Education v. Valden Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY v. OrthOregon Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Temple EasTex, Inc. v. Old Orchard Creek Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Richmond Steel, Inc. v. Legal & General Assurance Society, Ltd.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1993
- State v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Industrial Risk v. Garlock EquipmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.