Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. Whiddon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 13, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner attacks eleven informations, nine of which are alike as to alleged infirmities. It is not needful to quote these informations as the alleged infirmity appears in the manner in which the alleged date of the occurrence of the offense is stated. That part of each of such nine informations is as follows:

“That J. C. Sale and L. E. Overstreet of the County of Levy and State of Florida, on the 6th day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and thirty-six in the County of Levy and State of Florida, or at some time after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. Gandy v. PageSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1869

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BeamonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Horton v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Sparks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Baxter v. StackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API