Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Ross

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

The appellees filed an account against the-county, consisting of several items, for services as attorneys-rendered by them. The commissioners would allow only a part thereof. The appellees appealed to the circuit court,, where there was a trial by the court, a finding for the plain*405■tiffs, a motion for a new trial made by the defendant overruled, and judgment on the finding. The error assigned is the refusal to grant a new trial. There is no brief for the appeliees.

There was no record evidence of any contract with or ■employment of the appellees by the commissioners, nordoes it appear that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. English v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Board of Commissioners v. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Campbell v. BrackenridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Archer v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Scott v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Crutchfield v. City of WarrensburgMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Jones v. State Ex Rel. Indiana Livestock Sanitary BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Board of Commissioners v. ByrneIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API