Board of Commissioners v. Ross
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.
The appellees filed an account against the-county, consisting of several items, for services as attorneys-rendered by them. The commissioners would allow only a part thereof. The appellees appealed to the circuit court,, where there was a trial by the court, a finding for the plain*405■tiffs, a motion for a new trial made by the defendant overruled, and judgment on the finding. The error assigned is the refusal to grant a new trial. There is no brief for the appeliees.
There was no record evidence of any contract with or ■employment of the appellees by the commissioners, nordoes it appear that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- English v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Board of Commissioners v. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Campbell v. BrackenridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
- Archer v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
3Cited by9 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Scott v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Crutchfield v. City of WarrensburgMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Jones v. State Ex Rel. Indiana Livestock Sanitary BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Board of Commissioners v. ByrneIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.