Legal Opinion

Iannello v. Busch Entertainment Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 27, 2004No. 4:03 CV 138PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the motion of defendant Busch Entertainment Corporation (“Busch Entertainment”) to dismiss Count Two of the complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

I. Factual and Procedural History

On May 29, 2003, plaintiffs Joseph and Dorothy Iannello, husband and wife, filed the instant two-count complaint with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Count One is a claim for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Freedman v. America Online, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  2. Larry Philpot v. Independent Journal ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  3. Cárdenas v. MuangmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Roya Behnam v. Foundation Radiology Group, P.C. & Derek R. Armfield, M.D.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
  5. Roya Behnam v. Foundation Radiology Group, P.C. & Derek R. Armfield, M.D.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API