Legal Opinion
Humbird Lumber Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.
The material facts in this case are that the Humbird Lumber Company is the owner of extensive lumber plants at Sandpoint and Kootenai; years ago it constructed and installed at each of these plants complete water systems for use in its operations and for fire protection. Water-tanks have been erected at each plant from which water is forced through the systems. At each place it has installed a steam pump of one thousand gallons capacity per minute and an electric pump of five hundred and fifty gallons capacity per minute. These plants have been erected upon the lands of the lumber company…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Pocantico Water Works Co. v. BirdNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grever v. Idaho Telephone CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- McIntyre v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Garkane Power Co., Inc. v. Public Service Comm.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
- Inland Empire Rural Electrification, Inc. v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.