Legal Opinion

Luttrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1912No. 1417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault to murder, his punishnjent being assessed at four years confinement in the penitentiary,

1. There are several bills of exception that are too indefinite to be considered under our authorities. Appellant offered evidence which was rejected by the court. The object and purpose of the introduction of this evidence is not stated or shown by the bills. Some of the offered testimony, viewed in the light of the facts, if we could go to the evidence to consider it, ought to have been admitted on the theory of impeachment. We mention this so…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Dent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Gallagher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Luttrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API